The SHURE SM7B and TLM 102 are my favourite. And I own a few of them (87ai and the 67); they are great for ie. … KMS 104/ 104 Plus/ 105 Studio … “The TLM 102 is thus recommended as a true plug-and-play solution for home recording enthusiasts and aspiring pro mixers.” Review in KEYS Awards Keys Leser Award 2010. Grispy and sometimes sibilant. TEC Award 2010. It SEEMS like the C414 would be better suited as an acoustic guitar mic, whereas the 102 and 103 get slightly better reviews for vocals (I've already done some research). Which one should you get? acc gtr. The often compared Neumann TLM 102 vs the TLM 103 broken down side by side. Read the comparisons of Neumann TLM … Used for all kinds of audio recording applications from woodwinds to strings to vocalists and voice. With a newly developed large-diaphragm capsule that is capable of handling up to 144dB SPL, Neumann TLM 102 is perfectly … Without that it really is hit or miss, but is almost a dead ringer for the U87 from 1ft+ away without it to my ear. The 3 mics in my subject line (TLM 102, 103, AKG C414) are in my price range, and I've heard great things about all 3. It's clarity, low distortion and low noise characteristics make it a must have for any studio. MIPA 2010. It is considered by many as a good product to introduce people to the superior quality of Neumann mics. Big sound in a small package. Our bestseller. The TLM-102 is what I would refer to as Neumann's "sleeper" microphone. If you were to just own one microphone, for the money, this is the one to have. My voice is quite strong and I really shout loud. Well, a notable difference between AKG C214 vs Neumann TLM 102 is found in the feature set; Neumann TLM 102 doesn’t have any pre-attenuation pad or filter. Then again, the lack of such features doesn’t really impinge on the sound quality. The value in this microphone is second to none on the planet. TLM 103 The modern classic for vocals, spoken word, and more. Go and try them out at a shop, choose the one you like better Products TLM 102 A true Neumann at an affordable price. I really like my voice w/t TLM 102 than 103. It excels on female vocals, higher male backing vocals, acoustic instruments and percussion. On the other hand, AKG C414 is a more expensive condenser mic, but the features and capabilities are very interesting. Both are great microphones and produce a lively sound quality in a condenser mic for digital recording. "tlm 102 or wa87" the tlm 103 sounds harsh to me The 103 benifits greatly from a long gradual low cut starting ~1k for modern close mic'd vocal techniques. Both are built for use … 103 is physically heavier (210g vs 450g), has a bit brighter top end, has less noise (about 4dB difference), but 102 has better THD ratio (144dB vs 138dB), but in the end the differences between those two microphones still affect the quality of your recording way less than the change of performer or sound source. I have tried the mics above. So, this mic is really no-frill and straightforward. After that TLM103 and Beta 58. Neumann TLM 102 serves as an affordable model suitable for people looking for an entry-level Neumann mic. Similarities. However, there are some notable differences between the two that should be reviewed. This mic will be primarily used to record MY voice, so I really need it to work well with my mid-baritone/low …