In Allhoff’s article, he argues that it is morally wrong to clone because of some biological consequences that telomerase shortens from duplication. This issue shakes us all to our very souls. The theory states that even the simple things should not, Biotechnology and genetic engineering involve the cloning of animal cells and organisms, but they also involve the alteration of an organism in an effort to make it more perfect, whether it is a crop, an animal, or even a human being. Whereas cloning produces genetically exact copies of organisms, genetic engineering refers to processes in which scientists manipulate genes to create purposefully different versions of organisms—and, in some cases, entirely new living things”, duplication of genetic cells is known as human cloning. That is just one of the many reasons why cloning is morally and ethically wrong. Like most scientific advances, it's not morally right or wrong in and of itself. Alternatively, therapeutic cloning creates human beings in embryo form, but the embryos are used for experimentation and eventually destroyed. Denmark s Minister of Research agrees to the idea of cloning, or at least starting the cloning experiments. Sometimes terms such as “reproductive” or “therapeutic” cloning are used. So Maryland enacted a law that forbids allowing a cloned human embryo to live past the eighth week. So whether the clone is killed and dissected, referred to as “therapeutic cloning,” or implanted in a woman’s uterus and allowed to develop, referred to as “reproductive cloning,” the unnatural manufacture of a human embryo using the cloning process occurred. Those who oppose this proposition believe it is morally and ethically wrong. Kant, a German philosopher argued that what is accepted in the society is what makes people’s lives good and that is what is moral. As a conclusion, the issue of human cloning had brought to my mind the discovery of the atomic bomb. I personally don't particularly care if it's ethical, since no one's being harmed. Cloning of both humans and animals can help advancements in curing a variety of diseases. Insert the DNA from the donor cell into the egg, replacing the egg’s DNA. The main theme is good life out of cloning technology. Cloning treats human life as a commodity, another reason that human cloning is immoral.Last year, the Maryland legislature claimed to pass a law that prohibits cloning, but the definition of cloning written into law is not scientifically accurate. It is now used by millions of doctors around the world. And while cloning can bring benefits through research, might come next: human cloning. I was wondering why it is- I'd like to see the sides of why it is or isn't. Here is a discussion about the ethical issues that have arisen concerned with cloning humans. With scientific discoveries such as cloning many people rely on, Is Human Cloning Ethical? But, you are told and realize you are a clone and have to give your life to save another. The cloning of human beings has become one of the worst, With all the lectures and readings that we learned about this last seven weeks, I see that Christians are adapting to society 's views by my fellow classmate’s discussions and posts. It's the purposes that people use it that is right or wrong. A fundamental argument is that cloning is ethically wrong and various religious groups have rejected it saying that cloning is equivalent to 'playing God'. Proponents for cloning animals know that it can allow for a healthier lifestyle and help maximize production numbers, while opponents think that the technologies will be abused. Scientists define human cloning as the creation of a human embryo through cloning, described above. But the definition of cloning, and why the church teaches that it is immoral, may not be clear. The specific challenges that I will discuss are: Birth control, cloning, genetic engineering, and homosexuality. By votes of 11 to 5, the pro side has won the argument for cloning research. You have been told you have six months to live unless you can find two replacement lungs. I feel that cloning human beings is ethically and morally wrong. The sheer loss of life in both humans and non-humans is enough to prove that cloning would be a foolish endeavor, whatever the cause, for whatever need. Most people instinctively shudder when they learn that human cloning is currently legal in Maryland. Cloning could potentially allow advances in science that will benefit society as a whole. It's the purposes that people use it that is right or wrong. where armies are just clones. Instead of cooperating with God’s will to procreate through the conjugal act of marriage, cloning involves the creation of human life according to scientists’ will and predetermined specifications. Since genes can be tricky, recessive genes may show up too late in a clone, and a whole line of people may get affected. Maryland law defines human cloning as “the replication of a human being … in order to allow development beyond an embryo.” Human life is called an embryo from conception through the eighth week of gestation, and called a fetus from the ninth week until birth. That man was the ultimate polymath, a scientist in many fields, an artist in many fields, and quite an inventor, too. Cloning is at the beginning stages of being considered morally unacceptable and will soon, 8 December, 2014 Obviously the cloning of humans or the cloning of human cells is much different than the cloning of genetically superior livestock or a better quality, higher yielding food crop, and people throughout the world realize this. IF we ever perfect cloning in humans, I'd love to see if we can find some of Leonardo da Vinci's cells, for instance. Development of genetic engineering biotechnologies undermines the natural autonomy of life. Cloning should not be allowed to happen as people will not have anything unique about themselves, and it doesn’t only apply to people, it also applies to animals. Is that ethically right? The cloning of any species, whether they be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Instead of being a unique person, as happens when genetic material from a man and a woman are blended through fertilization of an egg by sperm, all of his/her genetic information came from one person, the person who was cloned. Another aspect of cloning we need to look at is producing actual "clones" from a human parent. He/she is made as follows. Human cloning is morally wrong because it undermines the dignity of the human person. Not just altering genetic code, but producing exact replicas. Cloning has caused a number, Kantian is regarded as one of the perfect theories ever as far as an issue of morality is concerned. Deliberately exposing humans to more evil is just morally wrong. He's Catholic (though not a very good one, considering he rarely goes to Church or whatever). WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush Monday criticized the creation of human embryos through cloning as "morally wrong" and "bad public policy," saying the procedure should not be … The cloning of any species, whether it s human or non-human is by all means wrong. Pro-lifers have called this practice “technological cannibalism”. If human cloning is carried out, it may well lead to uncontrolled results, abnormal development, genetic damage, malformation and diseases in the clone. This new person has no mother or father. It is hard to believe that not to long ago many people believed that joining a sperm and an egg in a test tube was considered to be morally wrong.